June 13 2013

Why We’re Broke: Closing Plenary at the Congress for the New Urbanism’s CNU21

Charles Marohne of Strong Towns

Charles (Chuck) Marohne, Strong Towns

Chuck Marohne, Executive Director of Strong Towns, said that the mechanisms of growth we have become accustomed to are waning. Local governments are forced to absorb the costs of new standards and requirements set by the powers that be. He argued that the current pattern of development is not sustainable without large tax increases and/or large public service cuts.

Marohne shared the photo below of his hometown of Brainerd, Minnesota in 1905.

Brainerd, Minnesota in 1905

He asked rhetorically, “How thick do you think the zoning code is here? How many boards and commission did you have to go through to build here? How much was the tax subsidy?” He said that this is a time before even 30 year mortgages.

Marohne argued that if 1905′s Brainerd, Minnesota wasn’t financially resilient, the town wouldn’t exist anymore- which it does.

However, the same street as above is now just surface parking lots and vacant commercial/light industrial buildings. There’s sidewalks and wide travel lanes, but nobody is physically participating in the space anymore.

Google Street View (2008) of Same Street in Brainerd, MN

“This is why we’re broke!” he said. There’s half a million dollars of infrastructure on this street, and it’s not getting used. “Every city is going to go broke if we continue to build places like that.”

He suggested some key topics of what he calls, “The Next New Urbanism”:

1. Relentlessly prove that we are the high return on investment

“Built it and they will come is a great movie plot. But, it is a terrible development strategy,” said Marohne. He thinks induced development is the wrong way to go. He brought things back to Salt Lake City by telling the audience that he doesn’t understand the financial side of the light rail system here, but he’s not very sure how effective it is if there’s an entire rail stop just for a Wendy’s.

2. Champion an incremental approach

He suggested building incrementally rather than all at once.

3. Advocate for an end to top-down solutions

He suggests embracing local problem solving instead.

“Innovation from the top down tends to be orderly but dumb; innovation from the bottom up tends to be chaotic but smart.”

What do you think are the most worthwhile public investments? Tell us in the comments below!

Credit: Images and references linked to sources.

Aascot Holt

Aascot Holt is an undergraduate at Eastern Washington University, pursuing a major in Urban and Regional Planning and a minor in Geography. She will graduate in the spring of 2013. She is from Stevenson, WA and currently lives in Spokane, WA in a brick 1936 kit house. She is most intrigued by small-city and small town planning, parks and recreation planning, long-range planning, and historic preservation. She hopes to continue her habit of being involved with many planning projects at a time, and fears being pigeonholed. Aascot maintains the “Being A Planning Student” Tumblr as well as her planning-centric blog, The Comprehensive. She is currently writing Cheney, WA’s entirely new comprehensive parks, recreation, and trails plan, completely pro bono. More can be learned about her endeavors via LinkedIn.

This entry was posted on Thursday, June 13th, 2013 at 9:45 am and is filed under Community/Economic Development, Environment, Environmental Design, Government/Politics, History/Preservation, Infrastructure, Land Use, Landscape Architecture, Social/Demographics, Urban Development/Real Estate, Urban Planning and Design. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.


One Response to “Why We’re Broke: Closing Plenary at the Congress for the New Urbanism’s CNU21”

  1. Ryan Says:

    Such a difficult concept for governments to grasp… letting go of current controls (zoning, building, economics, ASHTO) to allow development occur in a natural, pedestrian-centered fashion.

Leave a Reply

6 − two =


Follow US