March 28 2014

Moving the Capital: Public Transit in Washington, D.C.

The Washington, D.C. Metro is recognized as the trademark transit system of the capital city, but it is hardly a befitting one. With frequent breakdowns, and delays due to track work, it is a consistent source of frustration for the region’s commuters. Coupling this with the fact that it is currently operating over capacity during peak times, it is not surprising that the District has begun to explore other options to increase the mobility of its residents, even as the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA) works fervently to repair the dilapidated rail system.

Metrorail train stopping at a station in Washington DC

The DC Streetcar is the District’s initial move in the neverending chess match of providing efficient, affordable transportation options. This nostalgic nod to the past is a project that promises to redefine the city, assuming it is ever completed. The streetcar pilot project, a 2.4-mile line running along H ST NE, has seen countless delays, with initial construction beginning in 2008, and passenger service still a few months away. The price tag is also a major point of contention, with the total cost of the thirty-seven-mile DC Streetcar system estimated at $1.5 billion.

So, as city council and mayoral elections draw near, the debate surrounding DC’s transit future is heating up. Everyone seems to think that they know how to do it better, but to find the right solution the right questions need to be asked. Firstly, what is the purpose of any transit investment? If the answer is simply to move people from point A to point B, then some candidates may be justified in extolling the cost effectiveness of rapid buses compared to the estimated $50 million per mile to install a network of streetcars.

Picture of the DC Streetcar one H St NE

But urban planners argue that looking at transit in such a way is too simplistic. It’s also important to consider the value streetcars add by the development they spur. Buses, even rapid buses with dedicated lanes, don’t offer the same sense of permanency to developers that digging up roads and laying down tracks does. The resulting higher densities and land values near streetcar lines, and the increased property tax revenue, give the District the potential to turn the streetcar investment into a profit generating endeavor. Furthermore, there is the added consideration that people are generally willing to walk farther to access rail transit than to access buses.

But with so many competing interests vying for a voice in the process, and DC’s bus ridership increasing, there are still many questions the streetcar will have to answer. The current planning study focused on the North-South corridor is instructive of this. And it isn’t just questions of competing options for designs and routes. What impact will the streetcar have on housing affordability in a city already struggling to cope with rising rents? And what are the soft costs of construction like increased traffic congestion and the impact on small businesses?

Is the DC Streetcar worth it, or would the city be better served by more flexible, less costly transit investments?

Credits: Images by Chase Keenan. Data linked to sources.

Chase Keenan

Growing up in Tampa, Florida, Chase Keenan learned first hand what it means to live in a city that is built for cars rather than people. The influence of this experience, and his recognition of the urgent threat climate change poses, led him to pursue a career in urban planning. Now he enjoys the vibrancy that comes with life in Washington, DC as he completes his final semester of study at the George Washington University, where he is working towards a Master's degree in Sustainable Urban Planning. His focus throughout his studies has been aimed at understanding urban resilience, and how our cities can be better prepared to face the challenges of the future. But while he may be an urbanist by trade, he’s really a jack of all trades at heart, dabbling in hobbies as varied as snowboarding, muay thai, creative writing, and the piano.

Website - Twitter - Facebook - More Posts

This entry was posted on Friday, March 28th, 2014 at 9:00 am and is filed under Community/Economic Development, Infrastructure, Land Use, Transportation, Urban Planning and Design. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.


One Response to “Moving the Capital: Public Transit in Washington, D.C.”

  1. Raghu Krishnan Says:

    As a non resident I won’t pretend to know the details on ground for how local residents would use a bus versus a streetcar. But…from a conceptual standpoint, buses can be very fast especially if there are bus only lanes. With streetcars the tracks can be designed in such a way they function as a loop or one single line with two tracks to handle two way traffic. It’s a greener method of transport since hybrid or fully electric buses might have a hefty price tag. And the thing with buses is that not only do buses need maintenance but so do roads. Neither one is completely immune to breaking, cracking and in need of shutdowns for proper repairs. Needless to say that trams and tracks will too but I feel roads can break down much faster from weather related issues. Also, having a permanent fixture like tracks is visually appealing for businesses and residents. It will promote new construction and most likely be called gentrification but if it serves the need to make problem areas safer and better then that’s good. And with streetcars, more cars can be added to one tram versus a bus will have a finite load of passengers. As these neighborhoods burgeon with more residents a streetcar will adapt to the change. Buses will eventually create a bottle neck, even with bus only lanes. In any case, I enjoyed the article and wish the city all the best in deciding the future.

Leave a Reply

6 + one =


Follow US